Last weekend, Actress Angela Okorie was attacked by armed robbers or assassins and according to her, shot at her vehicle for over 30 minutes, Twitter user, Mopol, has stated that her account of the attack does not match the incident.
He stated this on Twitter while analysing what could have happened on the actress saying that there was no scratch or bullet scar on the body of her vehicle and so should stop the exaggeration even though he sympathizes with her on the attack.
The Twitter user also said that if it was assassins that they would not spend that much time shooting on a car that is not bullet proof and still leave without accomplishing which can take them just two minutes to do.
I saw Angela Okorie’s videos. I sympathize with her but one thing glaring is that her narration and evidence don’t correlate at all.. I’ll explain in a thread.
Let’s start by stating the information she gave. She said she was attacked by assassins, they sprayed bullets for 30 minutes. No help came. She showed the aftermath videos of her self, her car, her xray. Let’s start with the nature of the attack. She said assassins shot at her car for 30 minutes. The glasses were shattered, but somehow, they didn’t come closer to finish the job. As someone whose close relatives have escaped assassination. And lost a family friend to them, I know they don’t spend 30 minutes on a target they can finish off in 2 mins. Its armed robbers that may waste such time cos they are trying to steal as much as they can.
Watch the car here…
The only time even armed robbers spend such time spraying bullets is when robbing a bullion van or bank. Looking at the way the glasses shattered, it’s unlikely to be bullet proof. So the 30 minutes shooting sounds weird. Let’s go into details. There is no scratch or bullet mark on the body of the car in a 30 mins gunfire. This means that either they were shooting at close range, they target very good or the glasses were not broken by bullets. It brings the question again. If it was 1 or 2, they would have left her dead or in critical condition. And the biggest question, the glasses were broken, they had full access to the car, why didn’t they finish the job. How come the windscreen wasn’t damaged.
Now to the part that first caught my attention. The X-ray. Pellets have very high density and are distinct from bone in xrays. What I saw is either not metal pellets or the xray was of poor quality. And as you can see, they’re just hanging above the skin, no penetration. Glass was my suspicion. This is how glass looks on xray. Similar intensity with bone. More similar to the one she posted. Definitely there was an attack. But not just as it was narrated. Actually Very different from what was narrated.
Gunshots being sprayed for 30minutes is not something that only 10 ppl will talk about. Not to talk of 1 person. In this present age, it will trend before we know she was the victim. Back to evidence. I don’t want to screenshot her face but the injuries are not consistent with bullet wounds. Looks like someone that was in an accident or brawl. And the cuts look like glass. I may be wrong. One big question, if it was robbers and not assassins, why lie?
Hmmmm. Now the controversial part, What will make one lie about their attacker. First 2 things that come to mind, guilt and shame.
In Nigeria, what kind of attacker will make a victim feel some guilt or shame to expose?
Options;
1- someone you’re owing money,
2- someone you made mouth you’ll deal with,
3- someone you’re sleeping with their partner,
4- someone you stole from
Whatever you think, it’s your own opinion. But the only fact established in this thread is that the narration and evidence provided don’t tally. And I actually didn’t see any reason for someone that was attacked by unknown ppl to provide so much evidence. That raised brows already.
